Balgarianovinite.com
A federal judge in Florida smacked down President Donald Trump’s discovery request, which he filed in an attempt to salvage his defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, but did grant him additional time to file an amended complaint.
In 2025, Trump sued the Journal, the Journal’s publishing firm Dow Jones, parent company News Corp, owner Rupert Murdoch, News Corp CEO Robert Thomson, and two Journal reporters, Khadeeja Safdar and Joe Palazzolo, for defamation. The complaint alleged that a July 17, 2025 Journal article by Safdar and Palazzolo that reported Trump had contributed a letter and a lewd drawing to a birthday album for Jeffrey Epstein, compiled by the convicted sex predator’s accomplice and former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell.
Trump vociferously denied the report, threatened to sue, and then did so a day later.
Legal experts were highly skeptical of the lawsuit’s merit from the beginning. Because the president is a public figure, he has to prove the newspaper acted with “actual malice” in order to sustain a defamation claim; it’s a very high bar that political figures often fail to meet when attempting to sue journalists who have criticized them or published unflattering stories.
In September, the House Oversight Committee metaphorically nuked Trump’s case from orbit when it released a trove of materials provided by Epstein’s estate, including the birthday book. Inside the book was a page that said it was contributed by Trump, along with his signature, message, and drawing of a nude female figure — exactly as the Journal’s reporting had described it.
Last month, Judge Darrin P. Gayles of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, an Obama appointee, dismissed Trump’s complaint, finding that it had “not plausibly alleged that the Defendants published the Article with actual malice.”
Rescue of Drifting Chelsea 3 Was Unprecedented, Transport Minister Says 2026
Gayles granted Trump leave to file an amended complaint, and the president responded by filing a motion for additional time and a request for limited discovery on “[h]ow each Defendant acted with actual malice,” “[h]ow Defendants purposefully avoided the truth of the statements at issue,” and “[h]ow Defendants allegedly obtained the letter and supposedly verified its contents, including Plaintiff’s signature.”
Generally in civil litigation, a plaintiff has to have the basic elements of their claims ready in their complaint. The courts are fully aware that litigation can be expensive and burdensome, especially complying with discovery (subpoenas for documents, testifying in depositions, etc.); they will not allow a “fishing expedition” by a plaintiff who says he’s been wronged but can’t spell out how or who is at fault.
In a three-page order, Gayles applied this reasoning to reject Trump’s arguments for discovery. The president was currently “without an operative complaint,” since it had been dismissed in April, and now “seeks discovery to help him properly plead his claims,” the judge wrote. “But this is improper.”
Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Arrives for Celebrations of Birth, Dormition of St. John of Rila
Allowing Trump to engage in discovery before showing he could properly plead his claims in an amended complaint “contravenes the purpose behind the actual malice standard,” Gayles wrote, quoting from his order dismissing Trump’s complaint on why a higher standard is applied to public figures:
[T]here is a powerful interest in ensuring that free speech is not unduly burdened by the necessity of defending expensive yet groundless litigation. Indeed, the actual malice standard was designed to allow publishers the “breathing space” needed to ensure robust reporting on public figures and events. Forcing publishers to defend inappropriate suits through expensive discovery proceedings in all cases would constrict that breathing space in exactly the manner the actual malice standard was intended to prevent. The costs and efforts required to defend a lawsuit through that stage of litigation could chill free speech nearly as effectively as the absence of the actual malice standard altogether.
“Thus, allowing President Trump to conduct discovery on actual malice, where his initial attempt at pleading a defamation claim fell short, is exactly the type of ‘expensive yet groundless litigation’ the Eleventh Circuit has cautioned against,” the judge concluded.
Gayles denied Trump’s request for discovery and granted a short extension of time to file an amended complaint, with the new deadline set for May 27.
Order denying Trump’s discovery request in WSJ defamation lawsuit by sarahrumpf
Trump Shields Russia From New Sanctions Passed by Congress in Lindsey Graham’s Name 2026
—
The post Federal Judge Shuts Down Trump’s Discovery Request As He Attempts to Salvage Suit vs. WSJ: ‘Expensive Yet Groundless Litigation’ first appeared on Mediaite.
Federal Judge Shuts Down Trump’s Discovery Request As He Attempts to Salvage Suit vs. WSJ: ‘Expensive Yet Groundless Litigation’ 2026 THE NEWS FROM BULGARIA – NEWS AGENCY 2009-2025 2026-05-14 01:29:18 Latest news World news Country news Most important news latest news most important latest of the day Justice Petar Nizamov Feathers Petar Nizamov- Feathers Justice bg iustitia.bg iustitia iusticia usticia investigation Burgas Bulgaria news news of the last hour news of the day news of today Bulgaria news The news from Bulgaria blitz news top news most important most commented latest news Boyko Borisov news weather coronavirus news news weather facebook youtube facebook instagram news today news of the last minutes news today today news news bg news leading news hot news bg news site for news all news news bg news of the last hour latest latest news bg news of today news today news today news of the last hour latest news today news bg news news 24 hours news vesti bg novini news world bird bg bivol bg bivol trud bg novini latest news today novinite bg news hello bulgaria political party coat of arms delyan peevski scandalous Bulgarian National Television Free Europe Television scandal exclusive live tv live right now tv tv online tv program bg live now tv news online tv online live court Burgas court Burgas district court Burgas court Burgas district court Burgas district court Burgas appellate court Burgas prosecutor Burgas prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Prosecutor General Ivan Geshev Prosecutor Geshev Tsatsarov Ministry of Internal Affairs Burgas ODMR Burgas ODPR Burgas police Burgas district police Burgas prosecutor Tsatsarov SGS cases Varna court chairman of the SGS court decisions on civil cases decisions on cases Plovdiv court decision of the court decisions cases Varna court criminal cases district district court decisions work in the court SGS chairman of the SGS judges Sofia court post judges Plovdiv court Plovdiv judges Plovdiv Supreme Court Inspectorate Supreme Court Supreme Judicial Council lawyer lawyer criminal cases lawyer civil cases lawyer marriage cases lawyer administrative criminal law criminal process civil law civil process administrative law constitutional law
