Balgarianovinite.com
J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) issued a criminal referral for former Special Counsel Jack Smith to the Department of Justice, accusing him of allegedly making false statements during his congressional testimony, an issue that was already thoroughly dissected and debunked by numerous legal reporters last week.
The controversy relates to Smith’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee last December:
Question: Did you seek a search warrant for the content of any text messages from Members?
Smith: From Members?
Question: Yes.
Smith: No, I don’t recall that.
Question: Okay. It was just toll records?
Smith: Correct
…
Question: Did the toll records that you requested from the Senators, did they include the content of the phone calls?
Smith: No.
Question: Did the records that you requested, the toll records from the members of Congress, include the content of text messages?
Smith: No.
Last week, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) posted a tweet saying he had “received records [from] DOJ confirming Jack Smith’s investigative team reviewed the contents of text msgs sent by 44 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.” Grassley and other Republicans were quick to accuse Smith of not only an “abuse of power” but also of lying under oath during his December testimony.
However, as numerous legal reporters pointed out, the documents Grassley was writing about and what Smith was asked about during his testimony were “a completely different category of documents,” as Lawfare senior editor Anna Bower wrote, as the toll records his office requested from Congress contained information about the time of calls and text messages, not their contents.
“[T]here’s zero ambiguity here,” Bower added. “Nothing in the Grassley docs raises any real question of perjury.”
Nonetheless, in the letter Jordan sent to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche Wednesday, he wrote that there was “strong evidence” of a “potential violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001,” the federal statute prohibiting making false statements to Congress, federal courts, and other federal agencies:
The Committee on the Judiciary writes to refer strong evidence that appears to show Jack Smith, former Special Counsel, knowingly made false statements during his December 17, 2025, deposition. While testifying under oath, Mr. Smith seemingly made willfully and intentionally false statements of material fact that contradict new documents obtained by the Committee from the Department of Justice (DOJ). The Committee is providing this information for the DOJ to investigate a potential violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
The Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee fired back, characterizing the Republicans’ criminal referral letter as “fault[ing] Jack Smith for not reading the minds of congressional investigators and for not volunteering information they didn’t ask for.”
“This is absurd,” the Democrats added. “Jack Smith may be telegenic but he is not telepathic.”
In a separate statement, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), a former constitutional law professor and the Ranking Member on the Judiciary Committee, lambasted his Republican colleagues for “embarrassing themselves” with a “baseless and vindictive criminal referral” that “deliberately distorts and misstates the facts, including what questions the Republicans actually asked at Mr. Smith’s interview.”
Politico senior legal affairs reporter Kyle Cheney commented on the story by pointing out that these congressional criminal referrals, other than those that follow actual votes to hold someone in contempt of Congress, are “in general, are nonsense.”
“DOJ has had all of the information/evidence for months — the transcript/video of Smith’s deposition and the texts in question,” Cheney wrote. “They don’t need a referral from Jim Jordan to decide if a crime happened.”
The post Jim Jordan Issues Criminal Referral to DOJ for Jack Smith first appeared on Mediaite.
Jim Jordan Issues Criminal Referral to DOJ for Jack Smith 2026 THE NEWS FROM BULGARIA – NEWS AGENCY 2009-2025 2026-07-23 03:36:37 Latest news World news Country news Most important news latest news most important latest of the day Justice Petar Nizamov Feathers Petar Nizamov- Feathers Justice bg iustitia.bg iustitia iusticia usticia investigation Burgas Bulgaria news news of the last hour news of the day news of today Bulgaria news The news from Bulgaria blitz news top news most important most commented latest news Boyko Borisov news weather coronavirus news news weather facebook youtube facebook instagram news today news of the last minutes news today today news news bg news leading news hot news bg news site for news all news news bg news of the last hour latest latest news bg news of today news today news today news of the last hour latest news today news bg news news 24 hours news vesti bg novini news world bird bg bivol bg bivol trud bg novini latest news today novinite bg news hello bulgaria political party coat of arms delyan peevski scandalous Bulgarian National Television Free Europe Television scandal exclusive live tv live right now tv tv online tv program bg live now tv news online tv online live court Burgas court Burgas district court Burgas court Burgas district court Burgas district court Burgas appellate court Burgas prosecutor Burgas prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Burgas district prosecutor’s office Prosecutor General Ivan Geshev Prosecutor Geshev Tsatsarov Ministry of Internal Affairs Burgas ODMR Burgas ODPR Burgas police Burgas district police Burgas prosecutor Tsatsarov SGS cases Varna court chairman of the SGS court decisions on civil cases decisions on cases Plovdiv court decision of the court decisions cases Varna court criminal cases district district court decisions work in the court SGS chairman of the SGS judges Sofia court post judges Plovdiv court Plovdiv judges Plovdiv Supreme Court Inspectorate Supreme Court Supreme Judicial Council lawyer lawyer criminal cases lawyer civil cases lawyer marriage cases lawyer administrative criminal law criminal process civil law civil process administrative law constitutional law
